| Compared with the traditional equity, the collective shares for poverty alleviation have formed many innovative practices in the aspects of investment, equity type, right content, incomes distribution, exit mechanism, risk prevention, etc. However, there are deep seated problems such as weak system response, insufficient attraction of benefits, insufficient coordination of relevant interests, lack of long term incomes sharing mechanism, and limited participation in platform governance. We should base on the related practices in China, define the legal attributes of the collective shares for poverty alleviation within the framework of the collectives shareholder rights, and improve the systems of the collective shares for poverty alleviation. |