| The input of national strategic objectives and policy resources has become an important force to promote the transformation of grassroots governance structure. The dynamism of the grassroots (county) system has shifted the role of state power at the grassroots level. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the relationship between the sinking of state power and the initiative of grassroots institutions, and how to shape the transformation of grassroots governance in the era of strong state. At the grassroots level, the integration of county policy resources and the orientation of political performance goals are more prominent, supplemented by the overall administrative mechanism of the county to promote the implementation of policies. In this context, the grassroots governance structure presents: first, the core position of the county-level system leading the grass-roots governance system is further strengthened, the county and rural levels are integrated, and the ability of the grass-roots system to dominate the rural society is enhanced; Second, the governance rules and governance methods tend to be administrative, the allocation of project resources led by the section level is beyond the rural social level, and the grassroots social governance presents the characteristics of depublicization, weak social mobilization, and pan-institutionalization. However, from the perspective of the grassroots level, the input of project resources is undertaken and transformed by the county system, which makes it unable to effectively penetrate and construct a new grassroots social interest structure, and it is difficult to activate the political participation, villager autonomy and public governance at the grassroots level, so the grassroots governance structure is further institutionalized, and the performance legitimacy of the national agriculture-related policy is also affected. |