In the context of new urbanization, it is an important measure to promote the integration of village-to-residential communities into the urban governance system. The integration of village-to-residential communities into the urban governance system has formed at least three types of practice paths: "welfare supply", "task reversal" and "self-service", which are manifested in different types dominated by resource capacity, administrative ability and social autonomy, and present three modes and consequences of integrating into the urban governance system: suspension, rigid and activated, and their essential differences are rooted in the differential structure of political and social relations shaped by the contrast and interaction of "state-society" forces. Local governments should abandon the generalized welfare supply path and the behavior of excessive administrative tasks, follow the development law of independent integration of village-to-resettlement communities, and establish a balanced urban-rural adaptation relationship between government and society. The path of "self-service" aims to maintain the cohesion of the original village-community relationship, establish a new type of organization and party building sinking mechanism, and provide a feasible idea for the effective integration of village-to-residential communities into the urban governance system.